How cultural orientation affects business
Business leaders must consider a culture’s orientation towards business and innvoation when determining satellite expansion and new growth markets. PHOTO | BUSINESS DAILY
Kipchirchir formed a payment solutions company in 2010 based in Mombasa. He excitedly told clients about Mombasa as an idyllic place to locate a corporate headquarters, with its ancient history, mix of cultures and beautiful beaches, all visible from his office window.
As Kipchirchir grew his product offering, he decided to set up a satellite product development office to incorporate innovative new staff from a new region. He narrowed down his choices to Hyderabad in India, Silicon Valley in the US and Shanghai in China.
Each area offered positives and negatives. However, Kipchirchir’s main criteria entailed the creativity and innovation of the region.
In his research, he found out that the Global Innovation Index ranked China 29th in the world. India featured a dismal 81st in the ranking, only a few spaces ahead of Kenya’s 92nd place finish. All but one of the top 10 most innovative countries hailed from Europe and North America, with the US at fifth place.
Kipchirchir wondered why the manufacturing hub of the world and the programming capital of the globe featured so poorly in the ranking.
When Bloomberg compiled its own innovation index, it layered in education systems and amounts spent on research and development.
The different type of indicators resulted in South Korea and Japan in the top slots, with North American and European nations taking most of the next 20 places. Even Bloomberg ranked China poorly at 22nd and India did not even feature.
Kipchirchir contemplated the discrepancies among the economic powerhouses of the world. While Japan and the US historically generated more than 200,000 patents each year according to the World Bank, China had grown to more than 700,000 annually filed patents. The world’s second largest country, India, only filed under 11,000 patents each year.
So Kipchirchir eliminated India from consideration due to the lack of patents for such a large nation. Comparatively, Kenyans file around 120 patents each year. However, how could experts not consider China innovative?
Kipchirchir preferred Shanghai due to lower set-up costs for a branch office.
Friends in the high-tech industry pointed Kipchirchir towards research that originated out of the University of Michigan and that has been extensively tested and expanded by USIU.
Some cultures naturally support creativity and celebrate innovation, while others value the status quo, harmony and not rocking the boat.
Kipchirchir was stunned by the cultural influences on innovation and pulled the research to delved deeper.
Take an anecdotal snippet from the major Western versus Eastern religions. Christianity mainly spread during the time of the apostles due to the curiosity of Roman citizens throughout the Mediterranean.
Roman culture developed from Greek cultural underpinnings. Greek traditions valued the pursuit of knowledge, questioning one’s surroundings and one’s own existence and debating with one’s neighbours.
Locals enjoyed gaining new perspectives, debating new ideas and changing their opinions. The Apostle Paul in particular used Greek traditions to enter a city and speak and debate with residents.
Usually only when the influence began to threaten the perceived political order city officials would clamp down and impede Paul. Christianity initially spread overtly all over the Roman world until later covertly due to intense political persecution or scapegoating.
A religion could not have spread throughout the ancient Chinese Kingdoms in such a manner. Taoism and Confucianism developed as the dominant religions of ancient China.
Taoism places enormous emphasis in harmony and balance. The concept of the Yin and Yang, with good and evil coexisting in equilibrium, has featured prominently on the South Korean flag and comes from Taoism.
Confucianism taught an attitude of respect, especially for one’s parents, teachers, and elders. Ancient Chinese Kings prized Confucianism and Taoism because the harmony encouraged citizens to accept the realities of life and focus on inward peace and oneness with one’s surroundings.
Rulers felt that such principles would quell any temptations to dissent and threaten the political structures of the time.
The concepts became even more important as socio-political wisdom. So dynasties themselves spread the religions as a means of keeping order.
Researcher Richard Nisbett uncovered that a culture’s innovation orientation largely stems from its ancient economic activity.
Societies traditionally involved in fishing developed more truth-obsessed and curious cultures while agrarian farming-founded societies valued harmony and balance.
The fishing societies did not need their neighbours’ assistance to conduct their activities, while farming societies required help during planting, harvest, drought, insect infestations, among other eventualities.
So Greece with its fishing economy encouraged debate while the Chinese kingdoms with their farming economies fostered accord and balance.
Through centuries of migration and cultural export, European, North American, secular Middle Eastern and Australasian nations value innovation, challenging status quos and creativity in their education systems, workplaces and families.
East Asian and Southeast Asian countries, on the other hand, incorporate respect, harmony, decency and togetherness.
New technologies historically originate more in the former but become copied or perfected and enhanced in the latter.
Business leaders must consider a culture’s orientation towards different desirable attributes when determining satellite expansion and new growth markets instead of merely looking into statistics.
Source: Business Daily